How to read this in Australia
A record earns its weight by staying factual. Note what was planned, note what took place, and attach the file or message that supports the note.
Start from the parenting order, plan or written agreement now in force. Most family law here is federal, though Western Australia follows a different court path in some cases. Use the words that appear in your own papers.
Keep everyday days in the private record alongside the difficult ones. When a review is needed, select only the entries that answer the question in front of you. That is what lets an Australian family lawyer find the key facts quickly.
Recording law is state law, and the states disagree
There is no single Australian answer, which is why so much of what you read online is wrong for where you live.
In New South Wales, section 7 of the Surveillance Devices Act 2007 makes it an offence to use a listening device to record a private conversation to which you are a party. The maximum is five years imprisonment. Section 7(3) carves out narrow exceptions. All principal parties consent. Or one principal party consents and the recording is reasonably necessary for the protection of the lawful interests of that party, or is not made to communicate or publish the conversation to people outside it.
Victoria draws the line in the opposite place. Section 6 of the Surveillance Devices Act 1999 covers recording a private conversation to which the person is not a party. A party to the call falls outside it.
That is not permission to send the file around. Victoria makes it a separate offence under section 11 to communicate or publish a record of a private conversation, with exceptions that include a publication made in the course of legal proceedings.
So there are two questions and they have different answers. Was making it lawful where I live? Is passing it on lawful too? Check both against your own state or territory before you press record.
The evidence rules do not work the way you expect in parenting cases
Section 69ZT of the Family Law Act 1975 sets aside most of the Evidence Act 1995 in child-related proceedings unless the court decides otherwise. The court may give evidence admitted this way whatever weight it thinks fit.
Parents read that as an open door. It is not. It cuts in both directions. An unlawfully made recording is not automatically shut out, and courts have admitted such material where it went to a real safety question. A lawful recording is not automatically worth anything either.
What you are actually handing the court is a second piece of evidence about yourself. The judge deciding parenting arrangements reads how the recording was made at the same time as what is on it. Where the recording adds little that a dated log could not carry, that trade goes against you.
The practical rule is narrow. If the material goes to a safety question, get legal advice about it before you file rather than after. If it goes to who was rude on the phone, a dated log is the better document and it costs you nothing.
The affidavit rules do the filtering
This is where a folder of screenshots meets a hard wall. Rule 5.08 of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 caps an affidavit supporting an interlocutory application.
In Division 1 that is 25 pages and 10 annexures per affidavit. In Division 2 it is 10 pages and five annexures. Unless the court grants express leave, you rely on one affidavit from yourself and one from each witness, and only where that witness can say something you cannot.
The Central Practice Direction tightens it further. Affidavits must be updated and consolidated, and may not pull in an earlier affidavit by cross reference. You cannot rely on an affidavit filed later than two business days before a hearing without leave.
Ten pages is not many. That is the discipline the record has to survive. One line per blocked call, the annexure named, the rest kept privately in case you are asked.
Getting the call records you did not keep yourself
Your handset log is usually the only record of incoming calls you will ever hold. Carriers keep their own billing data on their own schedule and it is thinner than people assume.
You can ask under the Privacy Act. Australian Privacy Principle 12 gives you access to your own personal information held by an organisation. The regulator's guidance is that a reasonable period for an organisation to respond will in most cases not exceed 30 calendar days. There is no charge for making the request, though a carrier may charge for giving access as long as it is not excessive.
It reaches your own account only. It does not reach the other parent's records.
So the useful habit is dull and cheap. Screenshot the call log the same week. Save the voicemail audio off the handset rather than trusting the mailbox. Write the line while you still remember which call it was.
When the other parent stops the calls
Phone and video time is usually part of the parenting order, written as time the child communicates with a parent. Find that paragraph first, because everything else follows from its exact words.
One trap catches people early. A parenting plan is not enforceable, and a later parenting plan can negate a term of an order so that the term stops being enforceable. If the two of you agreed something by text after the order was made, get advice about what is still live before you file anything.
A person contravenes an order if they intentionally fail to comply with it, or make no reasonable attempt to comply. You prove the breach on the balance of probabilities. If the other parent claims a reasonable excuse, they carry the burden of proving it, also on the balance of probabilities. Only where the court is considering a fine or imprisonment does the standard rise to beyond reasonable doubt.
The part most people miss is that the court does not have to find a contravention at all to order make-up time. It can also vary or suspend the order, or send someone to a post-separation parenting program. Where a contravention without reasonable excuse is established, the range runs to a bond, costs, compensation for reasonable expenses lost, a fine and imprisonment. Those sit in Division 13A of Part VII of the Family Law Act.
You file an Application for Contravention, an affidavit, a copy of the orders you say were breached, and a family dispute resolution certificate unless an exception applies. Section 60I is strict about that certificate. Filed without one, and without an affidavit setting out the exemption, the application must be rejected.
Western Australia takes a different path
Most Australian family law is federal. But Western Australia runs its own Family Court, and for children of parents who never married the governing statute is the Family Court Act 1997 rather than the Family Law Act.
Surveillance law is separate again in every state and territory. The New South Wales and Victorian sections above are the two poles. The rest sit between them on their own terms.
The way you keep a record travels across all of it. The forms, the offences and the court do not. Copy the wording from your own order, then ask an Australian family lawyer which path is yours.
State, territory and pathway checklist
Name the state or territory and the court registry. Say if the plan is an order, parenting plan, or written deal. Use the words from that paper. Flag any Western Australian court path for legal review. Keep court papers, dispute help records, and daily notes in separate groups.
An Australian review note
Recording law differs by state, s 69ZT relaxes the evidence rules in parenting cases, and affidavits are capped. What that means for a call log in Australia. Sharing any of it in Australia takes a few more steps.
Work from a copy when someone needs to review the record. Include the current order or plan, a short timeline and a small set of named source files.
Check current court orders and rules before you send the pack. An Australian family lawyer can say what belongs in an affidavit, annexure, or private file.
Name the state, territory, and court path. Take extra care in Western Australia. A national guide cannot set the right court step for every case.
Copyable record for a blocked or missed call
One entry per scheduled call, written so it survives a 10-page affidavit.
ORDER PARAGRAPH:
CHILD:
SCHEDULED CALL (DATE AND TIME):
NUMBER OR APP USED:
ATTEMPTS (TIME OF EACH):
OUTCOME:
REASON GIVEN BY THE OTHER PARENT:
MESSAGE SENT AT THE TIME:
MAKE-UP TIME OFFERED OR TAKEN:
ANNEXURE REFERENCE:
ONE-LINE AFFIDAVIT ENTRY:- Useful entry
Order paragraph 6, Wednesday 6pm video call with Ari. Called 18:00 and 18:12, no answer. Message sent 18:15. No reply. No make-up time offered.
- Avoid
A recording of the other parent made in a state where that is an offence, annexed without advice.
Before a recording goes anywhere near your affidavit
Run these before the recording becomes part of your case.
Which Australian route is this?
Four things get called call evidence here. They go four different ways.
Is it your phone's own call history?
Screenshot it the same week and turn each event into one line. No permission needed to keep it.
Is it a voicemail somebody left you?
Save the audio off the handset and annex it only if it earns a place in the page limit.
Is it a recording you made without telling the other person?
Stop. Check your state or territory law on making it and on sharing it, then get advice before filing.
Is it scheduled time the other parent is blocking?
That is a contravention question. Find the order paragraph, then look at an Application for Contravention and the section 60I certificate.
Turning a call log into one line an affidavit can carry
Casewell lets you attach source material to the exact event it explains, keep a private evidence timeline, and export selected records as a court-ready PDF for review by an Australian family lawyer, dispute resolution or a court hearing.
Try for freeIs it legal to record a phone call with my ex in Australia?
It depends on your state or territory. In New South Wales, section 7 of the Surveillance Devices Act 2007 makes it an offence to record a private conversation you are part of, unless a narrow exception applies, such as the recording being reasonably necessary for the protection of the lawful interests of a principal party. In Victoria, section 6 only catches recording a conversation you are not part of. Get advice for the place you are in before you record.
If I recorded it lawfully, can I send it to my lawyer or post it?
Those are different acts. Victoria makes it a separate offence under section 11 to communicate or publish a record of a private conversation, with exceptions that include use in the course of legal proceedings. Most states restrict sharing in some form. Sending a file to a lawyer for advice is not the same as circulating it to family. The second one is where people get into trouble.
Will the court refuse a recording that was made illegally?
Not automatically. Section 69ZT of the Family Law Act sets aside most of the Evidence Act in child-related proceedings unless the court decides otherwise. The court gives whatever weight it thinks fit. Courts have admitted covert recordings where the material went to a real safety question. The court is also forming a view about the person who made it. This is the cost people forget to count.
How long can my affidavit be?
Under rule 5.08 of the Family Law Rules, an affidavit supporting an interlocutory application is capped at 25 pages and 10 annexures in Division 1, or 10 pages and five annexures in Division 2, unless the court grants express leave. You rely on one affidavit from yourself and one from each witness. That page budget is the reason a call log needs to be one line per event.
My ex is blocking the scheduled calls with my child. What can I do?
Start with the paragraph of the parenting order that set the call. A person contravenes an order by intentionally failing to comply or making no reasonable attempt to comply. You prove the breach on the balance of probabilities and the other parent carries the burden of proving any reasonable excuse. The court can order make-up time without even finding a contravention. You file an Application for Contravention, an affidavit, a copy of the orders and a family dispute resolution certificate unless an exception applies.
Does a text agreement change what I can enforce?
It can. A parenting plan is not enforceable in itself, and a later parenting plan can negate a term of an existing order so that the term stops being enforceable. Informal changes agreed by message can undercut the very paragraph you want to rely on. Keep the messages, and get advice on what is still in force before you file.
Is this a court form or affidavit?
No. It is a method for keeping a private factual record. Current court rules and expert advice decide how material is prepared or used in a proceeding.
Sources
Sections and forms named here are federal unless stated, and surveillance law is state law. Western Australia runs a separate court path. This is a records guide, not legal advice.
- Surveillance Devices Act 2007 (NSW) section 7
- Surveillance Devices Act 1999 (Vic) sections 6 and 11
- Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) section 69ZT and Division 13A of Part VII
- FCFCOA: preparing an affidavit, including the rule 5.08 limits
- FCFCOA: compliance with parenting or other child-related orders
- FCFCOA Central Practice Direction: family law case management
- OAIC: Australian Privacy Principle 12, access to personal information
- Australian Attorney-General's Department: Parenting arrangements after separation

