Custody documentation guide

Can I record my co-parent in Maryland?

for private conversations

Not without everyone's consent.

Maryland Courts and Judicial Proceedings 10-402(c)(3) permits recording only where "all of the parties to the communication have given prior consent". A breach is a felony, with up to 5 years in prison or a $10,000 fine. Section 10-405 bars unlawfully recorded contents from evidence in Maryland proceedings.

Main statute: Md. Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 10-402
Main caution: Felony; unlawful recordings inadmissible, with no spouse exception

Compare all 50 states and DC

Maryland is an all-party consent state, and its courts read the law strictly. There is no exception for recording a spouse. In 2018 an appeals court applied the law to a mother secretly recording her own child. Section 10-405 also bars unlawfully intercepted contents from Maryland proceedings.

Come to court ready, not stressed.

Turn messages, receipts and everyday notes into a clear attorney-ready record.

▣Message screenshotAttached

$School receiptAdded

≡Handover noteAdded

9:41Casewell

New record

Late pickup

11 June 2026 · 17:30 · Amelia

School pickup

Pickup was scheduled for 5:00pm. The other parent arrived at 5:42pm.

✦ Add evidence

Supporting files

▣Message screenshot✓

$School receipt✓

≡Handover note✓

Building your reportChecking dates, attachments, and edit history

✓

Report ready

Your report is ready

Ready for your attorney or lawyer to review.

PDFcourt-ready documentsPreview

Casewell report.pdf

Everyone has to agree

Maryland asks for the prior consent of every person in a private conversation. Being one of the speakers is not enough.

That covers phone calls and in-person talks. If the other parent is in a one-party state, do not assume the looser rule applies. Ask a lawyer first.

The exemption for private people is written tightly.

It is lawful under this subtitle for a person to intercept a wire, oral, or electronic communication where the person is a party to the communication and where all of the parties to the communication have given prior consent to the interception (Md. Cts. & Jud. Proc. 10-402).

Prior matters. Agreement given after the recording does not fix it.

Private conversations

Maryland protects an oral communication, which the Act defines as words "spoken to or by any person in private conversation".

So the in-person rule turns on whether the talk was private. A quiet conversation at a doorstep may be private, while a shouted exchange in a crowded car park may not be. That is decided later by a judge, so it is a risky thing to guess.

No exception for spouses

Many separating parents are still married. Maryland does not give them any extra room.

In Standiford v. Standiford (1991), the Court of Special Appeals refused to create a spouse exception. It said the statute "clearly and unambiguously prohibits all willful interceptions". There is "no explicit exception regarding the interception of a spouse's communication".

Parents recording their own children

In Holmes v. State (2018), a mother secretly used her phone to record a face-to-face conversation with her 8-year-old child. The recording was excluded under the Wiretap Act.

According to the court, a parent's secret recording of their child "falls within the plain language and broad reach" of the Act. It did not decide whether Maryland recognizes the vicarious consent doctrine from Pollock v. Pollock. It held that even if it did, the mother had not shown she recorded in good faith for her child's benefit.

Why the recording usually cannot be used

Under Section 10-405, unlawfully intercepted contents cannot be received in evidence in any Maryland trial, hearing or other proceeding.

A custody hearing is a proceeding. If the recording was unlawfully intercepted, the statute bars it and the recording may also show the court that you broke the law. That is a poor trade in a case about your judgment as a parent.

The cost of a breach

A breach of Section 10-402 is a felony. It carries up to 5 years in prison, a fine of up to $10,000, or both.

The person recorded can also sue under Section 10-410. The minimum is $100 a day of violation or $1,000, whichever is higher, plus punitive damages and legal fees.

What to keep instead

Write events down the same day. A dated note is your own account; it does not intercept anything.

Note the clock time, the words in quotation marks and who was present. A call log for custody records keeps calls in order. A factual incident report covers single events. Take both to a Maryland family lawyer.

A Maryland custody note you are allowed to use

Maryland usually shuts secret recordings out of court. A dated note is not shut out, so write it the same day.

Time it to the minuteNote the date and clock time you are writing, and the date and clock time of the event itself.
Quote, don't summarisePut the words you actually heard inside quotation marks. Mark anything you are paraphrasing as a paraphrase.
Name who else was thereList every adult and child present, and anyone within earshot who is not part of the family.
Separate what your child saidRecord a child's words as reported speech, and never question a child again to sharpen a quote.
Say whether it was privateNote where the conversation happened and who else could hear it.
Point at the corroborationName the message, receipt, school note or third party that supports the entry, and say where it is kept.

Keep the record a Maryland court can hear

Casewell keeps your dated entries, the words you heard and the files behind them in one private place. A note written on the day is far stronger than a memory rebuilt later. Export a focused PDF of the dates a Maryland lawyer needs.

Is Maryland a one-party or two-party consent state?

Maryland is an all-party consent state. Courts and Judicial Proceedings 10-402 needs the prior consent of every party to a private conversation.

Can I record my spouse during a separation in Maryland?

Not in secret. In Standiford v. Standiford, the Court of Special Appeals held there is no exception for intercepting a spouse's communications.

Can I secretly record my own child in Maryland?

In Holmes v. State (2018), a mother secretly recorded a face-to-face conversation with her child on her phone. The court held this fell within the Wiretap Act and excluded it. Take advice before recording.

Can a secret recording be used in a Maryland custody case?

Generally no. Section 10-405 bars unlawfully intercepted contents from evidence in Maryland proceedings.

What is the penalty for illegal recording in Maryland?

A breach is a felony, with up to 5 years in prison, a fine of up to $10,000, or both. The person recorded may also sue.

Sources

This page quotes the Maryland Wiretap Act in the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article, sections 10-401 to 10-410, from the General Assembly's official site. It refers to Holmes v. State and Standiford v. Standiford. It is not legal advice.

Md. Cts. & Jud. Proc. 10-402 — interception unlawful, felony penalty and the all-party consent rule checked September 2026
Md. Cts. & Jud. Proc. 10-405 — unlawfully intercepted contents not admissible checked September 2026
Md. Cts. & Jud. Proc. 10-410 — civil damages checked September 2026
Holmes v. State (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2018) — a parent's secret recording of her child checked September 2026
Standiford v. Standiford, 89 Md. App. 326 (1991) — no spouse exception under the Maryland Wiretap Act checked September 2026
Pollock v. Pollock, 154 F.3d 601 (6th Cir. 1998) — the vicarious consent doctrine checked September 2026