Your own conversations
Maine defines intercepting as hearing or recording a communication through a device. It then excludes three kinds of people.
They are the sender or receiver, anyone within normal unaided hearing, and anyone given prior authority by the sender or receiver. A parent recording their own call with the other parent is a receiver.
Within earshot
The second exclusion is unusual. 15 M.R.S. 709 excludes "a person within the range of normal unaided hearing".
So overhearing a conversation you can hear anyway is not an interception. That does not stretch to a device that picks up what you could not hear. A recorder in the next room is the device doing the hearing.
The edited recording offense
15 M.R.S. 710(2) is aimed squarely at court use. It is a Class C crime to present an edited or altered recording in court without "fully indicating the nature of the changes made".
That covers trimming a clip to the worst thirty seconds and presenting it as the whole call. Always keep the original file and say plainly what was cut.
What sits outside the exemptions
Intercepting a communication you are not part of is a Class C crime. So is knowingly disclosing or using the contents of an interception.
Maine also has a privacy law for places like bathrooms and changing rooms. There, recording sounds not normally audible outside needs the consent of all persons entitled to privacy. The person recorded can also sue under 15 M.R.S. 711.
Your child's calls
A call between your child and the other parent is one you are not part of. The sender-or-receiver exemption does not cover you.
Some courts let a parent consent for a young child under Pollock v. Pollock. That needs a genuine, reasonable belief that recording is necessary for the child's welfare. Maine has not clearly settled this, so get advice first.
Why editing is tempting, and dangerous
Real calls are long and messy. Both parents usually sound worse than they would like.
The urge to cut a clip down is understandable. In Maine, presenting that clip in court without explaining the edits is a crime. A written note that summarises the whole call avoids the problem entirely.
What a Maine court is weighing
Maine allocates parental rights on the child's best interests. The factors include each parent's willingness to encourage the child's relationship with the other parent.
A clip that looks edited to embarrass can hurt you there. A clear written record carries the same facts without that risk.
What to keep instead
Write events down the same day, with the clock time, the words in quotation marks and who was present. Mark anything you are paraphrasing.
A call log for custody records keeps calls in order. A factual incident report covers single events. Take both to a Maine family lawyer.
A Maine custody note that tells the whole story
Maine punishes edited recordings presented in court. A written note that covers the whole event avoids that. Write it the same day.
Keep the Maine record that needs no editing
Casewell keeps your dated entries, the words you heard and the original files behind them in one private place. A note written on the day is stronger than a memory rebuilt later. Export a focused PDF for a Maine lawyer.
Is Maine a one-party consent state?
Yes. 15 M.R.S. 709 excludes the sender or receiver of a communication, and anyone they authorize, from the definition of intercept.
Can I use an edited recording in a Maine custody case?
Presenting an edited or altered recording in a judicial proceeding without fully indicating the changes is a Class C crime under 15 M.R.S. 710(2). Keep the original and disclose any edits.
What is the penalty for illegal recording in Maine?
Intercepting, disclosing or using an interception is a Class C crime under 15 M.R.S. 710. The person recorded can also sue.
Is overhearing a conversation illegal in Maine?
Not if you are within the range of normal unaided hearing. The law is about using a device to hear or record what you otherwise could not.
Can I record my child's calls with their other parent in Maine?
That is a conversation you are not part of. Vicarious consent is not clearly settled in Maine, so take advice first.
Sources
This page quotes Maine Revised Statutes Title 15, sections 709 and 710, from the Maine Legislature's official site. It explains the law and is not legal advice.
- 15 M.R.S. 709 โ definition of intercept, excluding the sender, receiver and anyone within normal hearing checked
- 15 M.R.S. 710 โ interception, disclosure and presenting edited recordings in judicial proceedings checked
- 15 M.R.S. 711 โ civil remedy for unlawful interception checked
- Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press โ Maine recording guide, private places and civil damages checked
- Pollock v. Pollock, 154 F.3d 601 (6th Cir. 1998) โ the vicarious consent doctrine checked
- 18 U.S.C. 2511(2)(d) โ the federal one-party consent floor and its criminal-or-tortious-purpose proviso checked